Part 1:
· I found this to be difficult, my partner was talking about something
I was very interested in and I kept wanting to ask questions, but found without
being verbal I could not articulate my complex questions. Being silent in
itself was not hard, but not being able to show the question to my partner, I
had to remain curious throughout the entire conversation.
·
At first my partner was at a loss for words, and
laughed at my expressions, but as the conversation progressed my partner became
more comfortable and opened up, conversing me and accepting my silence and
listening intently. They did not alter their way of speaking, at least not in a
way I noticed. My partner struggled a bit to fill in empty spots because of my
lack of response, perhaps that is a noticeable change my partner made because
of my silence.
·
The speaking culture has the advantage, because
they can show much more information and communicate more complexly than the
culture who can only use body language and facial expressions. The speaking
culture may assume the culture using symbolic language is either stuck up and
refusing to speak to them or they may assume the non-speaking culture is
ignorant. Some individuals in our culture who have difficulty communicating
using spoken language are deaf and mute individuals, this effects them by
causing them to become better at communicating and showing their feelings in
non-verbal ways, like sign language and body language. It also teaches people
who communicate with individuals who have these problems how to understand more
than just verbal words.
Part 2:
·
I had to do the conversation in two increments
because I started giggling, but I did manage it. It was very hard not to use
any emotion or moving, I didn’t realize just how much I move and use emotion to
express feelings, until it was taken from me and I was no longer allowed to do
so.
·
My partner was interested by my lack of emotion
at first, but by the end of the conversation admitted to being slightly creeped
out and feeling like he was talking to a robot.
·
Movements while speaking are somewhat important
to the way we speak, for me I found it harder not to show any emotion verbally
or physically, then it being hard to not use my hands or body while I spoke.
·
Yes there are people in the world who have trouble
reading body language. The adaptive benefits of being able to read body
language are knowing how someone feels before they even speak to you, say a
person is angry, they walk a certain way and sometimes fold their arms or make
an angry face. An environment where it would be bad to read body language would
be similar to the environment shown in the movie and book titled “1984,” by
George Orwell. The book is about a government where people are constantly being
watched and have many, very strict rules they must follow or they are tortured.
Big brother is their leader and he is ultimate, the reason this would be a good
environment for people to be able to read body language is because, it could
put citizens in danger. The government would know if they were nervous or if
they were angry and would use this as a reason to believe they were not obeying
the law and torture them.
Part 3:
·
I believe that part one of the experiment would
have been easier if written language had been allowed, because it would have
been a way to better articulate an exact feeling or response to your partner’s
words or actions while talking with you.
·
Written language provides a culture with a way
to record important historical events. We can also develop and use it to show
differences between our culture and the culture of others.
·
Written language has allowed for more
information to be shared with more people than ever before. So in terms of “Globalization,”
it has helped us connect with our allies in other countries, we are now able to
effectively communicate and work with one another because of our connection
though written language and verbal language. We are also able to share our
ideas worldwide through written communication, we can learn about each other
and pass on information to the new generation.