Monday, April 11, 2016

My 5 Descriptive words: Poorly, Unique, Private, Magical, and Sacred

         I chose the word Poorly as one of my descriptive words because it can have many different meanings, depending on how it is used. When I first hear or read the word poorly my mind immediately thinks of someone without a lot of money, but in cases such as this article it means something entirely different, it is still a lack of something, but not a lack of funds. " the culture of this people is still very poorly understood." In this article he is talking about a lack of understanding, but uses a less known word instead of the obvious choice.

      Unique is one of my favorite describing words, because I think it sounds better and more appealing than the more used word, unusual. Unique to me feels special I would much rather someone tell me i'm unique than tell me I am unusual. Unusual can sometimes feel mildly insulting or derogatory, even though the two words mean practically the same thing. "While such a concern is certainly not unusual, its ceremonial aspects and associated philosophy are unique." I like how he chose to use both words in a way that made them both sound positive and make sense even in the same sentence.

        Private, is another describing word I like because, I am a private person and privacy means a lot to me. I also like the way in which Horace Miner uses private, to mean something you do alone or just don't tell others about. "While each family has at least one such shrine, the rituals associated with it are not family ceremonies but are private and secret." I enjoy being able to do things privately, because it benefits me and Private observations in the cultural anthropology area, could be very beneficial.

        My next descriptive word is magical, I chose this word because I enjoy all things fictional and magical. As a child I enjoyed fairy tails and princess dreams, now as an adult, I still enjoy fictional reading, especially when magic or magical creatures are involved. I liked how Horace Miner used the word to describe a person. "In the hierarchy of magical practitioners, and below the medicine men in prestige, are specialists whose designation is best translated as "holy-mouth-men." It is very interesting and draws a readers attention to the reading.
     
       My final descriptive word is Sacred, to me it is a fancy way of describing something that is important to you, but sounds much more appealing than the word important. If for example I were to say that a cultural anthropologists most important tool was their mind, that sounds okay, but to say their most sacred tool is their mind, somehow makes it seem more important, at least to me.  "The extremely sacred and traditional character of the rite is evident in the fact that the natives return to the holy-mouth-men year after year, despite the fact that their teeth continue to decay." I believe by adding the word extreme he also made the word sacred more powerful and drew more attention to the sentence itself.


Part B: Nacerima

1.  As an American, I feel curious and confused with how Horace Miner describes American culture and I wonder if this is America today, or maybe even a decade ago that he is talking about.

2. I did exhibit some ethnocentrism, when it came to visiting the "Holy-Mouth-Men" and teeth continuing to decay that seemed a bit unnecessary to me as well as the shrine visiting alone, that sounded interesting, but strange.  I  believe this reveals a bias of disliking pointless pain, and a lack of understanding and respect for spiritual procedures.  I feel my chosen words are free of bias in terms of culture, but not in how they were chosen, I chose them merely because I liked them, there was really no other reason, so they are somewhat biased towards me.

3. I believe the word poorly was some what biased and a better word might have been uneducated, because this could mean we lack because we have not been taught instead of assuming we just choose not to learn things that we do not find interesting enough.

4.  It is important to avoid ethnocentric judgments when describing other cultures, because we do not know why they do what they do or what has caused this dramatic change or effect. Just like you should not judge a person by what they look like, you should not judge a society, based on outward appearances. It is important to describe other cultures with out personal bias because, not only are you trying to educate yourself, but your trying to teach other people why things are done a certain way by certain people and you may even teach the people themselves how they came to be this way. You would not want to cast a bad shadow over a culture especially if they are already frowned upon by most other cultures. I do not believe it is possible to completely avoid personal bias, because we were all raised differently and have different morals, what may seem normal to us may seem disgusting to someone else, we cannot change how we think, but we can change what we say and prevent others from experiencing another culture through a biased anthropologist.

8 comments:

  1. Five submissions noted and points awarded. Full comments and score will be posted after Part B is submitted.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I know! When I read that it was really about the American culture, I was confused of his choice of wordings when describing the people. I honestly thought that he was talking about a culture that is untouched by modern civilization raised on folklore and strange behavior pertaining their faith. He said that the people had shrines in their houses with chests full of potions and such- I was not aware of American culture that is like that. Only thing I can think of is churches but that's for everyone to attend and not private. I think people need to be careful of how they word things when they describe what they observed because it can be taken out on a different context depending on the person on the receiving end.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I know! When I read that it was really about the American culture, I was confused of his choice of wordings when describing the people. I honestly thought that he was talking about a culture that is untouched by modern civilization raised on folklore and strange behavior pertaining their faith. He said that the people had shrines in their houses with chests full of potions and such- I was not aware of American culture that is like that. Only thing I can think of is churches but that's for everyone to attend and not private. I think people need to be careful of how they word things when they describe what they observed because it can be taken out on a different context depending on the person on the receiving end.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I appreciated your thoughts on the importance of avoiding ethnocentric judgements on other cultures. In particular you point out that the anthropologist has an opportunity to educate members of a culture on the "whys" behind their behaviors. This would be impossible if the Anthropologist allowed ethnocentric tendencies to influence them. I hadn't considered this possibility before. Thank you.

    Marc

    ReplyDelete
  5. You must have read my mind. I too was feeling a little confused that it was American culture the article was referring to. I have never heard of women sticking their heads in an oven, or a box with magical items in it, but I did see a lot similarities between the tribe in question and our culture. It just so happened that they were one in the same. I really like all the words you chose. Four out of the five words you used to describe the the culture I wouldn't think were an example of ethnocentrism. I completely agree with your thought on why it is important for us not judge other people or their cultures. Great blog.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hello,
    I really enjoyed reading your post. I chose a similar word to you (secretive) but I think private fits much better and does not exhibit any bias. I like how you explained that you mentioned how you have a lack of understanding and respect for certain religious practices. When it came to what these people did, I think I also do too. I think your explanations were very honest, which made me enjoy reading this even more.
    -Jasper

    ReplyDelete
  7. The article is actually from 1956 (as listed on the article itself). I admit to the fact that there are some behaviors in there that don't apply anymore (such as women "baking their heads" in those big hair dryers in old-fashioned hair salons... though some still use them) but for the most part it is still remarkably current in terms of our health and beauty practices. But it certainly does make you take a second look at how outsiders (which Minor is presuming to be) might see us, doesn't it?

    Let's go through your word choices:

    Poorly: This describes how the Nacerima were understood, not really the Nacerima themselves, correct?

    Unique: As you state in part B, you seemed to choose this word because you like it instead of how it accurately describes the Nacerima. "Unique" essentially describes all cultures, correct? It doesn't actually define just the Nacerima. That said, because it applies so broadly, it avoids casting judgment.


    "The article is actually from 1956 (as listed on the article itself). I admit to the fact that there are some behaviors in there that don't apply anymore (such as women "baking their heads" in those big hair dryers in old-fashioned hair salons... though some still use them) but for the most part it is still remarkably current in terms of our health and beauty practices. But it certainly does make you take a second look at how outsiders (which Minor is presuming to be) might see us, doesn't it?

    Let's go through your word choices:

    Poorly: This describes how the Nacerima were understood, not really the Nacerima themselves, correct?

    Unique: As you state in part B, you seemed to choose this word because you like it instead of how it accurately describes the Nacerima. "Unique" essentially describes all cultures, correct? It doesn't actually define just the Nacerima. That said, because it applies so broadly, it avoids casting judgment.

    Private: This was actually a fairly accurate, unbiased word.

    Magical: Now that you understand that Minor was describing Americans, do you still think this word applies? Is there anything "magical" about why we go to the dentist and how we care for our teeth?

    Sacred: This perhaps does still apply, as it tends to describe anything that is important to a culture, religious or not. That would depend upon how you define "sacred", which, I suppose, indicates a bias in your definition, wouldn't it?

    For your alternate words, again "poorly" doesn't actually apply in the first place as it doesn't define the Nacerima themselves, just our understanding of them. For the others that showed bias (really, only "magical", though potentially "sacred"), is it the word choice that was the problem or our understanding of the Nacerima based upon Minor's description of them?

    "...but your trying to teach other people why things are done a certain way by certain people and you may even teach the people themselves how they came to be this way."

    This is a good insight, particularly from an anthropological perspective. Not only are we trying to teach others about various cultures, we are just trying to understand them ourselves and why those behaviors exist as they do. How might ethnocentrism negatively impact the conclusions a cultural anthropologist might draw about another culture? Could we consider those conclusions reliable and factual if they started from a place of bias?

    Good final explanation on the possibility of anthropologists avoiding ethnocentrism.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hi Azure!

    I enjoyed reading through your word choices! Thanks for including the parts of the article where you got those words from - it was great to be able to reread those parts of the article with your perspective fresh in my mind. I appreciate that you ask a lot of "why" questions. Rather than just saying "sacred" was a descriptive word, you gave alternatives to what word Miner could have used instead, which made me think about the word choice even further as a carefully considered description for the Nacerima/American people. Your explanations for your five words helped me to focus on Miner's intent behind the words he chose, which in turn helped me understand the article/the culture better. Thanks for your insights!

    ReplyDelete