Wednesday, May 18, 2016

The Yanomamo Indians

The Yanomamo rules against killing differ from that of Western cultures by allowing revenge killings. For most Western cultures killing is only completely okay in war or if a person is sentenced to the death penalty. It also sounds like even if the Yanomamo cannot find the culprit guilty of the killing, but know his tribe, then they are more than willing to take it out on his tribesmen if he cannot be found. Here it is only legal to kill a criminal who has been convicted and sentenced to the death penalty, even if sometimes the wrong person is convicted, generally in western cultures, the killing ends there and is not considered revenge killing. Sometimes even a death of natural causes, although this was believed to be almost non-existent because there was always someone or something to blame, can start a streak of violence, killing, and carnage.
Revenge killing for the Yanomamo’s is the ability to go after a tribe when one of its members has killed a member of your clan. When a family member is killed, this may lead to revenge killing for the tribe guilty of committing the crime, woman might also be abducted in return for what was lost. To put it bluntly for the Yanomamo vengeance killing is completely legal and seen as normal.
Once you have the status of being an unokais, you are feared by non-unokais and can become rather wealthy, but can be sought after by other unokais who are looking to become more feared. The benefits of not being a unokais is that you would not be as sought after to be killed as a unokais. A man might choose the unokais path to become stronger and more feared, also wealthier rather than living the normal non-unokais lifestyle.
Revenge killing helps shape political structure by placing the more successful killers known as “Headman,” at the top of the social pyramid, able to run their village and make beneficial rules for their own gain, whereas lesser men must bow before him and do his bidding. This allows for stronger leaders, because of how much work and strength they need to make their way to the top.
Revenge killings help shape social status and social groups, a tribe who has better killers will be more high standing and powerful than that of a tribe full of cowardly warriors. One way revenge killings help social status specifically is when one tribe houses a very strong leader or unokais because people from other tribes will hear this and fear the leader and therefore hesitate to mess with his tribe. The more well known a warrior is puts him in more danger, but can also make his village safer for those who fear him.
Revenge killing generally begins with kinship, when a kin member is killed the chain of revenge begins. Personally from my understanding, I believe that without kinship or the care for one’s family, there would be no need for revenge killings at all because they would have no reason. Revenge killing could not exist in theory without kinship.
 A wealthier man, who has killed more than most men has a better chance of attracting or capturing wives and reproducing more frequently than a poorer or lesser man.
We have laws because while most of us may not want to do it, some of us might and those few people can continue to multiply and create a larger generation raised with the same beliefs that they share. Sometimes even having a law against it doesn’t necessarily prevent it. We also have to protect our population, the Yanomamo population fluctuates and gets lower because of all the killing they are allowed to do and then the non-ending cycle of revenge killing that follows their path.


5 comments:

  1. Good explanation of the Yanomamo in the first paragraph, but I would argue that our culture sees more exceptions than you have listed beyond war and death sentences. What about a police officer killing a suspect who puts others in danger? What about if you are in your home and an intruder breaks in? What if you are defending your family or yourself? Are these situations where the killing is at least understandable? If a person kills someone else defending their home, family or themselves, are they usually found guilty and punished or are these deaths found to be excusable?

    Okay on your description of the process of revenge killing but with regard to this sentence:

    "To put it bluntly for the Yanomamo vengeance killing is completely legal and seen as normal."

    Yes... and thinking again of the exceptions I listed above, isn't it considered "normal" for a person to kill another person if they are in danger of being killed themselves? The description was fine. In this sentence, you let a bit of judgement creep into your description.

    In general, you are correct about the benefits and costs, but you left out a key benefit for non-unokais, namely avoiding death! Remember that this practice can lead to an unokais' being killed during a raid (which of course would cause his kin to perform another revenge killing).

    Good discussion on the impact revenge killing impacts the various aspects of the Yanomamo culture. In regard to this sentence:

    "Revenge killing could not exist in theory without kinship."

    While I agree with you, I'm haivng trouble picturing a society without kinship, but point taken. There is also a system called 'reciprocal altruism', in which people can help those unrelated to them for immediate or a postponed benefit in return. This could also drive a system like this, even if no one is related to anyone else.

    "We have laws because while most of us may not want to do it, some of us might..."

    But that leaves open a HUGE question, completely unanswered. Yes, most people don't do this, but why would some 'might' want to? Behaviors, in general, don't happen out of the blue. They occur because those behaviors benefit the person doing those behaviors in some way. So do people in our society who kill do so because they receive some benefit? Certainly those who kill in defense of property, family or themselves receive a benefit, but how about a thief or a murderer? Often the murder happens in the process of obtaining some type of resources. You also see gang related murders that follow a pattern similar to the unokais system (and little kinship involved) by the way, which assigns power and status benefits to those taking part, correct? So we have laws against these behaviors not because no one should want to do them, but because people can benefit from doing them, and we need to provide a cost (imprisonment) to balance the benefits to deter these behaviors.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think we know killing happens during wars but we honestly do not like to talk about it. I have been in situations where I asked some very personal questions to veterans from current conflicts like "how many people did you kill?" or "how did you kill them?" and they get very tight lipped and do not have any more to say after that. I believe these questions in the Yanomamo tribe would be answered with pride because that is how they display their power in their culture. So in my opinion, killing is only okay under very strict circumstances such as self defense. Other than that it is still considered taboo and not really sought after in the United States.

    Randy C.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I really enjoy your input on my posts Randy and I agree with you honestly when I see a veteran the best words I can muster up is a thank you, I was raised that way, I have the urge to thank those who serve. I have never thought of asking them about their experiences, but perhaps if i had it would offer me a learning experience

      Delete
  4. Hello,
    Your post provided interesting facts. It seems like within the Yanomamo men there was a sort of brotherhood because of the vengeance they would seek when someone from their tribe was killed. To go as far as abducting the wife of the killer in order to prove a point showed that they were sending a message; to not ever be messed with again unless they desired death. What is kind of scary is the thought that if the killer couldn't be found then the village would kill whoever they saw first from the killer's village. Can you imagine innocent people dying because of anger caused by one person?Then again, that happens all the time with drive-by's, war, and with any violent situation really. I can now comprehend what the Yanomamo culture was about; unity and support. Overall, I really enjoyed reading your post!

    ReplyDelete